I remember in
January 2005 when the former inspector general of police, Mr. Tafa Balogun was
alleged and found guilty of
misappropriation of public funds, he was arraigned in a federal high court by
the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission(EFCC) he was convicted on a term
of six(6)months imprisonment.
The general
public criticized and condemned the judicial system because they felt the term
of imprisonment was not enough considering the level of crime committed, this
was also the case when the former Bayelsa state governor chief Diepreye
Alamieyiegha and his Edo state
counterpart Mr. Lucky Igbinedion and former Chief Executive of Oceanic bank
Mrs. Ceciia Ibru were convicted and sentenced on a term of imprisonment which
is seen to be minimal compared to the crimes committed by hem.
The concept that
was adopted is referred to as plea bargaining, this is an agreement in criminal
case between the prosecutor and the defendant whereby the defendant agrees to
plead guilty to a particular charge in return for some concession from the
prosecutor. This concept is mostly adopted in order for both parties to avoid
lengthy criminal trial and allow the criminal defendant to avoid the risk of
conviction at trial on a more serious charge.
This concept is
enshrined in section 14(2) of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission Act
of 2004,this concept is alien to our judicial system before it was introduced
by the EFCC and does not form part of our constitution, this is why there are
lapses and injustice to some because there’s no provision for it in our own
constitution, there are plethora of cases where ordinary people have been
subjected to full wrath of law for minor offences while public funds looters
were charged and given the option of plea bargaining simply because they were
arraigned by the EFCC.
Plea Bargaining
is well known in countries like India, United States of America and other
common law jurisdiction such as United Kingdom and Wales and it has helped the
criminal justice system of various countries.
There are
diverse opinions about this concept, a lot of legal luminary referred to it as
unconstitutional practice in Nigeria which was smuggled into our criminal
justice system because it was not provided for in the constitution but merely
an EFCC concept.
Some
stakeholders see it as a welcomed development but Nigeria is not mature enough
for it because of the high level of corruption in our system and that this will
only be a soft landing for looters of public funds.
Professor Itse
Sagay said it will be a welcomed development if looters are stripped of what
was stolen.
In my own
opinion it is criminal to arraign treasury looters for several years without
conviction or acquittal, the concept of plea bargaining should be included in
our constitution, it won’t just be constitutional but will also be available to
other minor offenders since conviction of an offender is to serve as deterrent
to future offenders but before this is done, the judicial, executive and
legislative arms of government should be reformed so that they all can act independently without
fear or favor.
What is your
take on the concept of Plea bargaining as this blog visitor let’s hear your
opinion.
Thank you.
Oyenike
Alliyu-Adebiyi.blogspot.com
My opinion is that plea bargaining should be incorporated into our constitution so that the minor offenders can enjoy same while it should be abolished for public looters (At EFCC) so they can serve more jail terms.
ReplyDeleteI m in support of plea bargaining,its save tax players money, Etc whereby we dnt just spend years on a case,considering de level of corruption in our society
ReplyDeleteI m against it madam,offenders must be prosecuted,so it will serve as lesson to others
ReplyDeleteThank you all,your opinions count
ReplyDelete